10 to resign from SPL
The 10 other Scottish Premier League clubs have revealed their intention to resign from the current league set-up following the two seasons' notice they are required to give. Hearts chief executive Chris Robinson - speaking on behalf of 'the 10' - made their decision known at a meeting at Hampden Park which was originally held to thrash out rights over terrestrial television and radio coverage of games next season. That would mean only the Old Firm would remain as part of the current format but Celtic chief executive Ian McLeod is confident a solution can be found. He said:
"To be in a position in two years' time where Rangers and Celtic have no league to play in I think is an unthinkable proposition and will not happen. There will be some form of agreement reached in terms of league structuring. But let's be clear here, Rangers and Celtic are still part of the SPL, it's the other 10 clubs which have elected not to participate. Perhaps that's encouraging for the other clubs below them within the league structure."
The 10 clubs have thrown Rangers and Celtic a lifeline by offering them the opportunity to join the breakaway league upon its conception in season 2004/05. Rangers vice-chairman John McClelland admits the situation is "reasonably serious" but claims there is plenty of time to explore all avenues and reach a solution before the two-year notice period is up.
McClelland said:
"We are definitely not panicking. It is a reasonably serious issue but we have a long time to discuss and negotiate and get it resolved. I would expect that we'll continue positively and constructively in the SPL for the next two years and, beyond that point, there will be the strong essence of Rangers and Celtic in Scottish football. It leaves us between now and two years from now to reach some sort of resolution and that clearly from our point of view would include Rangers and Celtic, it could include the 10, it could include others. I think it's far too early to formulate but there is plenty of time to do that. The next step is that we'll talk together and we'll also talk to the other agencies involved in Scottish football - the SFA, the SFL and we'll continue dialogue through the SPL and with the other 10."
Rangers and Celtic both vetoed plans for an SPL TV channel last week, prompting claims they both had a 'hidden agenda'. But McLeod claims only the 10 clubs outside the Old Firm had the hidden agenda and their actions have thrown the future of Scottish football into uncertainty. He added:
"There has been a lot said about hidden agendas but I think the hidden agenda was revealed today. It would appear quite clear that there was a high degree of unanimity very quickly around the table that this was the action to be taken. Clearly there is a collapse in terms of the media market and that's no-one's fault, it's just the way that economics have driven it. There was a deal on the table for an SPL channel last week and we believe the business risk attached to it was too severe so we voted against it on that basis. We came here in good faith today to look forward to a constructive dialogue on how we might take Scottish football forward and improve the viability of it through the media deals that were on the table. Against that backdrop to throw uncertainty around Scottish football again as a result of that action is very surprising."
McClelland agreed positive steps regarding television coverage had been taken and that he, too, was surprised by the '10's' decision to quit the league. He said:
"We were surprised. The meeting had gone very, very well until that point with very constructive dialogue about the TV channel and about some of the alternatives to ensure there is live TV from Scottish football next season. Some of the reservations and concerns about the financial risks associated with any proposal had been reduced to some extent by new information that was put on the table. Given that, we were surprised that the 10, or Chris Robinson on behalf of the 10, intimated their intention to resign from the SPL at the end of the season. I think they have done it this time because they are concerned at the structure of the voting rights and the media distribution and I think their concern is mostly about that and not about the TV channel deal that didn't quite materialise."